|
フククラ ヨシヒコ
Yoshihiko Fukukura
福倉 良彦 所属 川崎医科大学 医学部 臨床医学 機能・代謝画像診断学 職種 教授 |
|
| 論文種別 | 原著 |
| 言語種別 | 英語 |
| 査読の有無 | 査読あり |
| 表題 | A pilot study of the diagnostic and prognostic values of FLT-PET/CT for pancreatic cancer: comparison with FDG-PET/CT. |
| 掲載誌名 | 正式名：Abdominal radiology (New York) 略 称：Abdom Radiol (NY) ISSNコード：23660058 |
| 掲載区分 | 国外 |
| 巻・号・頁 | 42(4),pp.1210-1221 |
| 著者・共著者 | Masatoyo Nakajo, Yoriko Kajiya, Atsushi Tani, Megumi Jinguji, Masayuki Nakajo, Tohru Nihara, Yoshihiko Fukukura, Takashi Yoshiura |
| 発行年月 | 2017/04 |
| 概要 | PURPOSE:The purpose of the study was to examine the diagnostic and prognostic values of 18F-fluorothymidine (FLT)-PET/CT for pancreatic cancer by comparing with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/CT.METHODS:Fifteen patients with newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer underwent both FLT and FDG-PET/CT scans before treatment. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in detecting nodal and distant metastases were compared between both scans using McNemar exact or χ 2 test. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic significance was assessed by Cox proportional hazards analysis.RESULTS:Both scans visualized all primary cancers. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy per patient basis for detecting nodal metastasis were equal and 63.6% (7/11), 100% (4/4), and 73.3% (11/15) for both scans, and for detecting distant metastasis were 100% (6/6), 88.9% (8/9), and 93.3% (14/15) for FDG-PET/CT, and 50.0% (3/6), 100% (9/9), and 80.0% (12/15) for FLT-PET/CT, respectively, without significant difference in each of them between both scans (p > 0.05). However, of 4 patients with multiple liver metastases, FDG-PET/CT was positive in all, but FLT-PET/CT was negative in three patients. At univariate analysis, only FLT-SUVmax correlated with PFS (hazard ratio, 1.306, p = 0.048), and FDG total lesion glycolysis (TLG), FLT-SUVmax, and FLT-total lesion proliferation (TLP) correlated with OS (p = 0.021, p = 0.005, and p = 0.022, respectively). At bivariate analysis, FLT-SUVmax was superior to FDG-TLG or FLT-TLP for prediction of OS [HR (adjusted for FDG-TLG), 1.491, p = 0.034, HR (adjusted for FLT-TLP), 1.542, p = 0.023].CONCLUSION:FLT-PET/CT may have a potential equivalent to FDG-PET/CT for detecting primary and metastatic cancers except liver metastasis. FLT-SUVmax can provide the most significant prognostic information. |
| DOI | 10.1007/s00261-016-0987-1 |
| PMID | 27891549 |